Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (102106)	4/4/2000 7:29:00 PM
From: Gopher Broke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576336

Re: 9909 CPUs I am surprised noone has suggested yet that they might be examples of the counterfeit processors?

To: Petz who wrote (102106)	4/4/2000 11:34:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576336

Petz - RE: "crazyman's serial numbers are legit week 9 of 99. My CPU has "0009" exactly where his have "9909". No question about it. These early CPU's probably have some "errata," but whatever, they work." That date sure is interesting. I wonder if there is any way we could find out for sure these aren't counterfeits w/o cracking up the case. JC has some AMD contacts, maybe they will be able to tell him when these wafers may have been started for this early processor. Or if someone who doesn't post here knows they can just send me an email - shj61@hotmail.com