Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : All Clowns Must Be Destroyed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry Whitman who wrote (23121)	4/5/2000 9:12:00 AM
From: Alias Shrugged	Respond to of 42523

siliconinvestor.com But, like, seriously, dude; where else are you gonna invest??

To: Terry Whitman who wrote (23121)	4/5/2000 7:12:00 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42523

I have not thanked you adequately--or at all--for that extraordinary link. Of course, what some of us have had to learn over and over again is that you cannot extrapolate current conditions using past events, but at least you can learn things in a general way. If America had looked carefully at Dienbienphu, maybe we wouldn't have ended up losing the entirety of Vietnam. (I realize that these comments compress an awful lot of poltical and economic history.) It is possible that what we are looking at in comparison to the crash of 1929 will comparable. Let us hope that the economic consequences are not comparable to the Great Depression. There's a difference between losing out in Vietnam and losing out at Stalingrad. So the financial consequences may go beyond 1929-1932, but maybe the fundamental economic ones won't. Maybe we can stop at 9% unemployment instead of 25% or more, while seeing declines in equities equal to what Japan saw.