Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lee kramer who wrote (91781)	4/5/2000 1:51:00 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Agree. How about EMLX which was #1 tech stock of the year drop from 225 to 54. There is no value, only after the stock 'dies' and you got out at the highs. Value lies in getting the stock at the cheapest price you can get it. Value lies at counting your profits at days end or after a 1-2 day hold. The cash you end up with is value. Value has no connection with the stocks actual valuations. If the sector is not in favor it could be undervalued for 5 years and stay that way. The only exception is not to knock yourself out and lose before you even start by getting companies with no earnings altogether. The individual investor and market gives the stock value. Value is getting a $50,000 Blackgamma sable coat for $4,439.22. That is value. Value is not getting it at $51,000 because its a great coat and everyone wants the 'status' of owning it.