SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cirruslvr who wrote (102279)4/5/2000 1:59:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576297
 
Some unverifiable Spitfire and TBird benchmarks on JC's:
At 600 MHz, engineering samples, not clock locked.

CPUMARK
THUNDERBIRD 69.3
SPITFIRE 61.9
K7 512K 56.3
PIII 256K 55.7
PIII 512K 44.3
CELERON SSE (FSB 66MHZ) 41.6
CELERON SSE (FSB 100MHZ) 48.2

When overclocked to 850, the TBird is above 100, a new
record. The only thing a little worrisome is the MHz rating,
a trifle low even for an ES?
NOTE: WHEN REPLYING TO THIS POST, UNCHECK FIXED FONT UNLESS
YOU MANUALLY SUPPLY CARRIAGE RETURNS AFTER EVERY LINE.
jc-news.com

Petz



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (102279)4/8/2000 3:14:00 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1576297
 
For some reason I think what Jerry said was a slip of the tongue. Why would AMD pre-announce so late in the Q, one week before earnings come out, and in Japan during a press conference of all places?

Cirruslver

I think he had to preannounce....Q1 nos are in and they are much better than what he preannounced 2 mos ago...if he didn't preannounce again, the street would not have been happy.....and he has enough trouble already with the street.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News