Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (66642)	4/5/2000 2:49:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Good point. But I still don't see any reason for the bill to be written to give the mother sole decision making authority. It could just as easily be written with language of "a parent" instead of the mother. Yes it is the ricochet potential that I am most concerned with. <<Say a woman takes off and later leaves her child at a police station the father would then have a shot at recovery.>> If he knows that is what happened or knows where to look for an annonymous abandonment. Now we are looking at children much older than a dumpster baby, right? I have a feeling that this is the tip of the iceburg. This idea seems to me to have far reaching potential and that is why I like the idea but don't want to see a bill rushed through under the guise of saving a dumpster baby.