Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff Kirk who wrote (102356)	4/5/2000 5:11:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 1577802

Nice to see you again. Stick around for the fireworks. Jim

To: Jeff Kirk who wrote (102356)	4/5/2000 5:40:00 PM
From: Goutam	Respond to of 1577802

Jeff, > What happened to the "quiet period" before earnings? I don't think SEC imposes any quiet period. It's mostly self imposed and doesn't mean that much. > PS, nice artwork Goutama , kind of reminds me of Cyrix M-2 logo....... Thank you. Regards, Goutama

To: Jeff Kirk who wrote (102356)	4/5/2000 5:52:00 PM
From: DRBES	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577802

I guess today was similar to yesterday, sans midday dip. New closing high and new all time high. Also to whomever is the keeper of the earnings estimate tally: My "scoping guess" of $0.69 was made approx. February 10, 2000 and not March 1 when I suspect you started the list. re: "What happened to the "quiet period" before earnings?" Perhaps this really is the quiet period before earnings. Do expect a lot of selling on the news; no matter what it is. I have not clue. Much depends on how enormous start up expenses show up in accounting practices. Depreciation will also be large. The most relevant "handle" will probably be cash flow but, even that will not give a good clear picture. The CC should be interesting. Mean while inteL is "throwing all the money in the world" at the problem of catching up to and surpassing a team that about three years ago was a year behind them and as recently as one year ago was arguably almost six months behind. That very same team or set of teams is now racing to make their lead decisive. "WHO KNOWS" what is in store, only the shadow do. Regards, DARBES