Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: If only I'd held who wrote (93513)	4/5/2000 8:39:00 PM
From: Steve1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108040

I got into NATS just before you. I traded it up to 14 5/8 on the last run and then bought a long position of 5k shares. It took ameritrade 4 partials to fill it. The company is IMO gold. They have been around since before computers. They have for real income and actually make a profit. The parent company is solid. Now for the problem. The float is so small the MM's are playing us (investors). The spreads are nuts. If anyone or ones came in to buy 15k worth of stock it would explode. The stock is for real oversold. On a buy the spread widens virtually everytime. I owned a stock, GNRL, last year and went nuts trying to trade it. In the case of NATS I think it will take care of itself. It will only take a couple of well placed PRs. Regards, Steve