To: long-gone who wrote (105 ) 4/8/2000 12:44:00 PM From: Lilian Debray Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 183
The Son of the Jupiter Effect? LOL. If you survived 1982, where will you be on 5/5/2000? "The Geophysical Institute has been receiving inquiries about dire events, including earthquakes, that are supposed to plague the earth in 1982 because of something to do with alignment of the planets. This leads us again to comment on the "Jupiter Effect," a name taken from the book published in 1974 by astronomers John Gribbin and Stephen Plagemann. While the book was undoubtedly a financial success, it has caused much needless concern and has proven to be a scientific flop. Briefly, the authors proposed the following bizarre chain of events: When the planets are aligned on one side of the sun, the tidal forces create sunspots which create solar flares which create streams of solar particles which enter the earth's upper atmosphere which changes the weather which slows the rate of the earth's rotation which triggers earthquakes. Got it? John Gribbin closes the episode in the July 17, 1980 issue of New Scientist where he retracts his theory, claiming that he was "too clever by half." (By this he explains he means that if he had jiggled the figures a little differently, he could have predicted the Mt. St. Helens eruption.) It is as one of the book's chief critics astronomer Jean Meeus tersely commented in 1975, "The Jupiter Effect does not exist." gi.alaska.edu earthsky.com newage.miningco.com Planetary Groupings and the Millennium: Why Panic? By Jean Meeus Adapted from Sky & Telescope, August 1997 "Above: Hey, relax! There will be no "planetary effects" during the year 2000. The doom and gloom forecast because of a grouping of the planets is no more a concern than your automobile's odometer flipping to a round number. SOME PEOPLE SEEM OBSESSED by groupings or "alignments" of planets. This is especially true as the year 2000 approaches, a pretext for doomsayers to draw attention to certain astronomical events and to claim that these will cause disasters here on Earth. As if the fact that the "round" number 2000 could have some special, physical meaning! The occasion of our calendrical "odometer" flipping to 2000 is simply a consequence of our decimal numbering system. If we used an octal system (base 8), we'd be celebrating the coming of the year 3720. Moreover, the start of the Common Era is just conventional. On January 1, 2000, the Jewish calendar will already read year 5760, while for the Muslim calendar it will be 1420. The growing popular interest in the foreboding approach of 2000 is bolstered by a planetary grouping in early May of that year -- a favorite event cited by the mystically minded." skypub.com skypub.com