Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Susan Saline who wrote (22944)	4/6/2000 11:12:00 AM
From: Ron McKinnon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

I gotta brag just made the best trade of my life, although small short QXLC at 95 and 103 now at 59 in less than 2 hours this market is wacked out

To: Susan Saline who wrote (22944)	4/6/2000 11:38:00 AM
From: Paul Moerman	Respond to of 53068

I'm sucking wind on GUMM too, fortunately not a big position. NEON is much more rewarding today! Flipped it Tuesday for a nice quick gain, then bought back yesterday at 33 ish. From the looks of it, 40-45 shouldn't be too hard to reach in the next couple weeks, all depending on their upcoming earnings? Did you ever get in VLNC? It was hammered in recent days, but may be great risk/reward right here IMO!

To: Susan Saline who wrote (22944)	4/6/2000 11:54:00 AM
From: DanZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

GUMM. Sue, I know a lot about Gum Tech, and seeing the stock trade at 12 is testament to the fact that the stock market doesn't always value companies properly in the short term. While this reaffirms my belief in technical analysis for short term trading, I firmly believe that investors will do well with the stock over the long term. One can look at past charts of most any stock that investors made a lot of money in over the last few years and find periods when they were weak. I'm even more convinced now after my experience with Gum Tech that there is literally no relationship between stock prices and fundamentals. Dan