Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: If only I'd held who wrote (93611)	4/6/2000 9:44:00 AM
From: johnsto1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108040

I shorted it when you were pushing it and I made a ton.What's it at now $8? nice.

To: If only I'd held who wrote (93611)	4/6/2000 9:46:00 AM
From: johnsto1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

if only ...hows that short on GENE working out.$29. ceo from cra on pwer lunch and I don't think he was scheduled. Did it really only take them "7" months to map the dna of the human body. Genomics is moving fast. CEGE is a steal under $35.

To: If only I'd held who wrote (93611)	4/6/2000 9:48:00 AM
From: GraniaO	Respond to of 108040

You're pretty snide, Nomadic. Please stick to business.

To: If only I'd held who wrote (93611)	4/8/2000 3:59:00 AM
From: Bud G	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108040

NATS also appeared to be vastly undervalued in 1997: Started By: dan serachitopol Date: Jan 2, 1997 10:07 AM Does anybody follow this brokerage co., based in Seattle. Their fundamentals look impressive: no debt, EPS=1.65, price=7 !!! They are actively underwriting IPOs. What's the catch ? Happy investing ! Dan After three years, hundreds of bullish posts here on S.I., and the launch of its new online brokerage firm, NATS is still languishing around the $8 level. Either there is something funky with this company or the market has completely misread it. Puzzled and perplexed. DT