SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79171)4/6/2000 3:35:00 PM
From: Dennis O'Bell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Would this qualify as a "transportation accident"?

news.excite.com

Note the partners page at the site

kreindler.com



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79171)4/6/2000 3:43:00 PM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Michael, the hits just keep on coming:

"Five-Year Survival Rates in EECP Therapy Patients Comparable to Surgical Revascularization"

biz.yahoo.com



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79171)4/6/2000 5:34:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
To All, Doggerel for Friday:
While the tech stocks are chased by idjits,
RTI will sport double digits. <g>



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79171)4/7/2000 1:28:00 AM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
FON - WCOM?
I wonder if you have any thought's about FON as an investment / arbitage plays.With a collar at 76%, this one looks like a relatively sure 30% profit. And WCOM appears quite cheap know too,so one would have appreciation potential on top of that.
Of course there is a risk that the merger falls through, but with Sprint's attractive assets, chances are very high, that somebody else will pick them in this case.

I have considered WCOM to be overvalued most of the time but right now at 42 1/2 $, they look quite cheap to me. I have played USW very successfully and I am tempted to do the same thing again with FON.

Any thoughts?