To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (102683 ) 4/6/2000 7:49:00 PM From: Ali Chen Respond to of 1574848
<FACT: Intel is producing at least one million Coppermines per week from a single mega-fab, and currently has four other fabs producing Coppermines in various volumes.> Interpretation: a milestone of 1 million was achieved on that particular week; speed distribution is unknown and most likely in junk sub-600 MHz range; even so, some morons at Intel mispredicted the balance between socket-370 and SECC packaging, and a glut of socket-370 Cumines cannot find a proper board (that works reliably). <FACT: Intel produced around 32 million CPUs last quarter, including "millions of Coppermines." And even that huge volume wasn't able to satisfy demand.> Interpretation: the demand has shifted into upper bins of speed distribution; nobody knows how many low-frequency stuff is counted in that aggregate number. <FACT: AMD's stated goal for this quarter is 1.2 million Athlons, a small drop in the bucket compared to Intel's actual volumes for last quarter. (OPINION: AMD may be sandbagging, but even twice that number is still small compared to Intel's volumes.)> Comment: And your point is ... ? <FACT: Dell announced last week that their supply problems are behind them now. Dell is also an Intel-only company and continues to be one, despite the rumors.> Interpretation: Intel production is enough to supply it's main factory outlet only; others are on allocation. <FACT: The grey market is typically Intel's lowest priority, and yet many vendors on Pricewatch.com are listing Pentium III 800 MHz and above for sale.> Remark: the 800MHz parts have 28 entries on Pricewatch while the 600MHz part has 75 entries, or three times of the former. Where is the center of distribution? <Still think I'm weaseling about the facts?> Sure we all do think this way. See the above. <Perhaps you should set aside your mistaken notion that Intel is in dire trouble, even though AMD is making gains.> Good for you, one important "moron-neutron" transition has occured already (for our goods), now your turn "peon-moron" is in order <g>. You are doing good. < And perhaps you ought to set aside your hostility. After all, we're all making money here, no? > No. How about those investors who were scared out of the stock because of your "weaseling"? <Life is good ...> It should not be for you, for the above reason. As you can see, your "facts" are no good even to wipe an a$$.