Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (94036)	4/6/2000 9:56:00 PM
From: $Mogul	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

So funny, well for the most part he is right and I blame CNBC for a lot.

To: puborectalis who wrote (94036)	4/7/2000 12:40:00 AM
From: SirRealist	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108040

I heard TSCM's technical analyst bailed after breaking his own rules, taking losses and he suggested he'd be filing for bankruptcy. Someone emailed his column to me. The problem, to me, is this: I like Cramer's writing. He's a good read. But he's never added a dime to my coffers. Same with Harmon and many others. Occasionally, Thom Callandra and TJoe at least make me money. As an investor, where self-interest is paramount, the value of TSCM is nil. Measured as a publication, one good writer does not make a zine. I think SALN is a well rounded, informative, interesting zine with many good reads. Its cash generation needs fixing, but it deserves to survive.... and it may not. Measured against SALN, TSCM doesn't come close. Thus, with minimal aid to investors and lacking the talent to survive as a publication, TSCM fails to measure up. As a cofounder, Cramer might find better answers by providing services as well as ClearPoint and others, instead of grousing about the devaluation. That requires dedication, not puffery. And Cramer's smart enough to know it.