Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grayhairs who wrote (10104)	4/7/2000 12:03:00 AM
From: Salt'n'Peppa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15703

<<< Salty, would you expect the west flank structure to be roughly the same length as the ELH anticline (~14 miles) ?? >>> I don't see why not. The Lost Hills thrust is a massive feature. The ELH play only extends for 14 miles along (parallel to) this massive thrust fault. It seems reasonable to assume (intuitively) that the "WF---tight syncline---ELH anticline" group would be represented along much of the 14 miles of mapped ELH structure. Since this group of structures was apparently folded from a cohesive sheet of rock, I would assume that there aren't any "tear-aways" to the west of the mapped ELH structure. I would also assume that the WF closure (NW & SE dipping axes) would occur in relatively similar locations to those of the ELH structure. Above are a lot of assumptions, but they follow the KISS rule. It's difficult to express my thoughts without a simple diagram, but I think you will get my meaning. Let me know if you agree/disagree. Welcome back (very timely!). S&P PS: How about that Renata today!