SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (102800)4/7/2000 1:18:00 AM
From: kash johal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575719
 
Joe,

re: why qualify SRAM

Several reasons:

1. SRAM is basically a regular structure. So finding process weakspots and yield killers is easier.

2. Newer processors with integrated L1 and L2 have well over 50% of CPU area devoted to SRAM blocks. So it is important to verify that the SRAM design is good, fast and high yielding.

regards,

Kash



To: Joe NYC who wrote (102800)4/7/2000 1:23:00 AM
From: Charles R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575719
 
Joe,

<what is AMD doing with SRAM? >

It is a good qualification vehicle. And, should AMD choose to productize, I also see some interesting possibilities for high speed SRAMs in communication applications as well as L3 caches. SRAM market is real tight right now and a high speed SRAM could be a high margin product.

Chuck



To: Joe NYC who wrote (102800)4/7/2000 1:37:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1575719
 
Joe,

The EETimes and Register stories did not seem to be inconsistent to me. I have found the Register to generally be an extremely reliable source of information, though I think you are correct about the wrong usage of the term "synchronous" in the Register article.

The recent instability of T-Bird would explain the 600 MHz sample being benchmarked by JC.

BTW:I was doing a search for JC, and found a pretty funny site:
extra.newsguy.com

Scumbria