To: Joe NYC who wrote (102858 ) 4/7/2000 9:56:00 AM From: Cirruslvr Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572600
Prudential's report on Intel (and AMD) Basically, he is saying there is room for Intel and AMD in the market and both should be fine if the strong demand continues and both companies stay rational w/pricing. He also says Intel's gotta get to Willy ASAP. I got this from Multex.com ____________________________________________________________ EQUITY RESEARCH INTEL CORP. APRIL 7, 2000 INTC: WEAKNESS VIEWED AS A BUYING OPPORTUNITY - EXPECT MORE AGGRESSIVE RAMP OF WILLAMETTE. Subject: Intel Corp. (INTC?$129 13/16)--OTC SEMICO OPINION Current: Strong Buy Analyst: Hans C. Mosesmann (650) 320-1631 Prior: Traci Tsuchiguchi (650) 320-1639 Risk: Low 12-month Target Price: $165 Ind. Div.:$0.12 Yield: 0.13% Shares: 3484 mil. 52-Wk.Range: 145-50 EPS FY Year P/E 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Actual 12/99 $ 2.32 55.6X $ 0.57 $ 0.51 $ 0.55 $ 0.69 Current 12/00 $ 2.92E 44.5X $ 0.70E $ 0.66E $ 0.73E $ 0.83E Current 12/01 $ 3.30E 39.3X $ 0.78E $ 0.75E $ 0.83E $ 0.94E * EPS from continuous operations is used for the FY99 and FY00 figures. Summary Bullets: - We see recent INTC weakness as a buying opportunity before the conference call on April 18 th . - The x86 processor market may not be a zero-sum game in the near-term, hence both Intel and AMD benefit. Speculation on Dell and AMD is a minor matter either way. We expect both competitors to be ?rational? which is good for both stocks for much of 2000. - The real question is the speed of the Willamette volume ramp in 2H00 which arguably will be the best x86 architecture to date. A quicker than expected ramp would be favorable to Intel in 2001. - We would buy the stock before the conference call. The x86 Market Is Not A Zero-Sum Game...For Now Yesterday?s weakness in INTC stock appears to be related to AMD?s momentum with its Athlon chip (indeed), and continued speculation that Dell will use AMD in one or several low-end desktop models later this year (Dell has denied this, however, a minor matter either way). Basically, investors may be worried that the x86 processor market is a zero-sum game which would favor AMD given the latest press releases. We disagree. Near-term, we believe both Intel and AMD should benefit from fairly strong bookings trends and a fairly benign ASP environment as both companies act ?rationally?. Furthermore, we expect Intel to post upsides to Q1 consensus estimates and to have a strong outlook for processor demand for the rest of the year given the promising prospects of Windows 2K and server demand. Longer term (2001 and beyond), we actually believe that Intel will have the edge again, assuming a smooth transition to the new Willamette processor later this year. We believe that the recent weakness in Intel stock is a compelling buying opportunity before the conference call on April 18 th . The Question Is Not Athlon Vs. Coppermine, It?s Athlon Vs. Willamette First of all, we do believe AMD has a slight edge with its Athlon vs. Intel?s latest PIII Coppermine. Why? Athlon is based on a newer microarchitecture than the old P6 Intel architecture, and in our opinion is just a bit more efficient all else being equal. Curiously, the Athlon?s yields at the higher speed are quite high and perhaps ahead of Intel?s Coppermine at this time. However, this dynamic is already in these stocks. The real question going forward is Intel?s next generation ?P7? 32-bit architecture called Willamette which should be the architecture to beat when introduced in the second half of 2000. While AMD is expected to introduce Thunderbird (high-end) and Spitfire (low-end) variations of Athlon later this year (which both incorporate on-chip L2 cache, which has been is a differentiating factor between the PIIIs and Athlons), we expect that these derivations will be overshadowed by the highly anticipated launch of the Willamette. Intel Must Accelerate The Product Cycle Under normal circumstances, Intel?s new product (Willamette) ramp would be limited during the first couple of quarters given the initial die size of the chip is usually about twice the size of the chip its meant to replace (Coppermine). Assuming these die size ratios and relatively fixed wafer capacity, you get twice as many Coppermines than Willamettes, which means that a quicker than normal ramp would necessarily lead to market share losses. Not going to happen, in our opinion. Therefore, Intel must add capacity more quickly to offset this competitive threat, which is what we believe will happen in 2001 and possibly in 2000. While the stakes are higher for Intel given the execution problems in 1999, we do believe that investors will give the company the benefit of the doubt once the company?s second half 2000 outlook becomes clearer during the conference call on April 18 th . Prudential Securities Incorporated makes a primary over the counter market in the shares of Intel Corp. Prudential Securities Incorporated (or one of its affiliates) or their officers, directors, analysts, or employees may have positions in securities or commodities referred to herein, and may, as principal or agent, buy and sell such securities or commodities.