Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Dorsey Wright & Associates. Point and Figure -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich1 who wrote (7154)	4/7/2000 9:41:00 PM
From: Tigress	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9427

Rich1, BDH trades as a Holdr on the AMEX, min 100 shares. I'm not implying that Holdrs are great vehicles to hold indefinitely because the concepts do go out of favor (ie B2B, B2C), nor that the BDH should be purchased now. I note that most Holdrs are issued +/- 95. The PPH traded to the low-mid 70"s after it was issued, so as you can see it's a supply & demand rotation-type thing here. It is interesting however, to know the component parts & what participation each stock is in the Holdr tho. Jay, if you're listening........................... DWA used to include the components of some Holdrs in the Co Info section. It was convenient because it showed each stock's activity just like you'd see if you had set up your own portfolio or had accessed DWAGILD's Co Info. But alas, that feature vanished. In the BDH, I note that LU has >25% participation and understand LU may likely trade lower &/or sideways. So IMO, LU tends to mitigate the upside potential of the BDH in the intermediate term. OTOH, perhaps stocks with smaller participation have greater upside potential. Just my analysis. Hope it helps. Tig