SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79206)4/8/2000 8:11:00 AM
From: Terry Maloney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Michael, following up on Sanjay's question on thirds ... I got a vivid demonstration of one basic reason when RMBS moon-rocketed last month, just after I'd bought a first third of puts, and I only lost a third of what I would have otherwise. This would obviously apply in reverse, in the sense that at least you'd be 'in' in the case of a sudden plunge ...

But in more normal circumstances, how do you decide on second (and third) thirds? For instance with puts, if the stock price stays flat, do you buy a second third closer to expiry, thus saving some time premium? If the stock moves up, do you buy a second third at a correspondingly higher strike? If the stock moves down, do you buy at a correspondingly lower strike, or do you pay more for the same strike price? Or is it all just a matter of gut feeling? <g>



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79206)4/10/2000 12:21:00 PM
From: Sanjay Mazumdar  Respond to of 132070
 
MB Thanks



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (79206)4/12/2000 1:27:00 PM
From: Sanjay Mazumdar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
MB I went through this and some other links from Thomas. None refer to the thirds strategy. This refers to the 90-10 strategy