Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris who wrote (22685)	4/9/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

I plan to bail on q at 160. Re-enter lower AGAIN!

To: Chris who wrote (22685)	4/9/2000 5:34:00 PM
From: Sergio H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Great post Chris. Any opinion on the recent gaps in SBC and HD? Also, would be interested in your opinion on how to interpret gap fills. Recent examples (of gap fills) of interest are AXSI and DPH. Sergio

To: Chris who wrote (22685)	4/9/2000 8:51:00 PM
From: Challo Jeregy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Hi Chris. Re gaps - on the Nas - Per my charts, the gap was filled. Granted, it was by a fraction, <g>, but it did fill the gap. I don't see any gaps on the NDX. Are you using closing #'s for gaps? Thurs hi/lo - 4324.09/4196.51 Fri hi/lo- 4446.45/4323.18 edit- I just saw your charts. It appears as if you are using the closing #'s. More important than the gaps at this time, imvho, is the broken trendline.