SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Selling Puts: Have Cash Will Travel -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: OX who wrote (1155)4/9/2000 9:04:00 PM
From: Dan Duchardt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1235
 
OX,

w/o any serious analysis, I'll throw out this... why not just buy the stock if you think it'll grow over time? or buy LEAPS.

I quite agree. I have couple of long LEAPS calls positions. I think it's quite an attractive way to play a stock that is fundamentally strong but beaten down. A relatively cheap ATM or slightly OTM LEAPS call limits your risk while affording a lot of upside potential.

Dan



To: OX who wrote (1155)4/9/2000 10:06:00 PM
From: Tom K.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1235
 
...if you sell LEAPS and the stock tanks, you could get assigned prematurely....

OX,

Since LEAPs have a great deal of time value, there's little chance of assignment.

I use LEAPs as an adjunct to my basic PUT selling strategy. I'll sell an OTM LEAP on a quality issue and leave it on the back burner. As time passes, the time premium decays and when I need a filler to make my numbers, I'll cash it in.

For example, I sold DELL Jan01 42.5 for 9 in Nov. If I did it right, I tied up $2125 in collateral for $900 income for each contract. It's now worth $5. If I cash it in, I'll get an annualized return of about 50% and it's available when I need it. Because I cheated and really didn't have the full 50% collateral set aside, my annualized return will be closer to 100%.

Not suggesting that others do as I do, just pointing out that selling LEAPs can serve a purpose for some.

Tom