SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d:oug who wrote (51261)4/9/2000 9:57:00 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116836
 
Heard thru the gatavines, a Caf‚ member standing tall against the ESF.

Cloaked in secretly, U.S. Treasury Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF).

All of this commentary are reasons to focus on James Saxton's
ESF Transparency and Accountability Act (H.R. 1540)
to mandate transparency and accountability from the ESF.

The following is a letter written by one of your Caf‚ members
to members of Congress to attract further sponsorship of this Bill:

[Start.]

Dear Senator Hutchison, Senator Gramm, and Congressman Smith,

I urge you to support Congressman Jim Saxton's bill, H.R. 1540,
to reform the secret slush fund of Bill Clinton and Treasury
Secretary Summers (see below).

The "separate but equal branches" requirement of the Constitution
was included to prevent one branch from exceeding its authority.

The secrecy now permitted is an invitation to manipulation
by the executive branch.

Even more troubling is that "Congress is supposed to control
the purse strings", which is clearly not the case
with the secret U.S. Treasury Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF).

This country was founded on the underlying principles of capitalism
and free markets. Oddly, there was no uproar from Congress when
Alan Greenspan, the (private) Federal Reserve chairman said
in a statement before Congress that, "central banks stand ready
to lend gold in increasing quantities should the price rise."

Why doesn't Congress care when Mr. Greenspan clearly states
that "central banks stand ready to intervene in a free market?"

I am very troubled by the secrecy shrouded manipulations of
the Fed in, quite probably, the gold market and, more than likely,
in the stock market..... is there a "Plunge Protection Team"
consisting of the Fed and the "favored insiders", Goldman Sachs,
Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, etc?

The smell coming from Washington, the Fed, and Wall Street
is becoming a stench. It is time for honest Senators and Congressman
to demand a return to the rule of law, for all citizens,
including Bill Clinton, the Treasury, Janet Reno, etc.

Reverse America's course toward executive fascism.
Congress is a separate and equal branch.
Demand that the executive branch ahere to the Constituition
and account to Congress for the funds they have.

[End.]

Doug



To: d:oug who wrote (51261)4/9/2000 11:06:00 PM
From: Rarebird  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116836
 
Pragmatism is derived from the Greek word Tpayua ( the first letter should be the letter pie but I don't have a Greek keyboard in front of me), meaning action, from which our words practice and practical come. The pragmatic method strives to interpret each notion by tracing its respectful concrete consequences. People whose orientation is primarily pragmatic will compromise (or in some cases give up completely) their values or principles for the sake of a good or positive result, such as money or sex. In this light, momentum investing and the present US asset bubble is basically pragmatism ( amongst other things) at work. If it works, keep on doing it. That is to say, buying equities produces great long term results so if I'm pragmatic, I will continue to buy equities on every dip. Who cares about fundamentals? That deals with speculative reasoning. What counts is results not theorizing as to what may or may not happen. On the other hand, Gold hasn't worked as a long term investment for 20 years, so if I'm pragmatic, I will stay away from it like the plague. Sounds Superficial? It is.

Now you partly know why it is so hard to break this bubble and to get the POG to hold above $300 an ounce. To break the back of the typical pragmatic American Investor, the NDX will have to close below its most recent lows this past Tuesday.

As for Giulanni, I thought he might have a shot against Hillary in NY because he is a moderate Republican who is liberal on social issues. But he is no friend of Gold IMO. He is all for the exuberance on Wall Street, along with our Governor, because of the added revenues.