Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Echelon Corporation (ELON) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Andrew Brockway who wrote (1799)	4/10/2000 2:33:00 PM
From: Lone Star	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3076

Here is why I wade through the muck and mire on Yahoo, we actually have a number of excellent posters, and this guy is the best. re: HomePlug by: AmadaeusM (M/Southeast) 4/10/00 1:54 pm Msg: 33273 of 33283 buttemt asks (paraphrased) : "Why isn't Echelon involved in HomePlug?" The reason is very simple. Read the press announcements on HomePlug very carefully and watch the choice of words. The goal of HomePlug is Internet/IP connectivity over powerlines in the home, linking PCs and network appliances together. What they are talking about is high bandwidth internet and data connections, not control applications. And since LonWorks now communicates over IP, HomePlug could be complementary to LonWorks. But lets assume for a minute that HomePlug and LonWorks are competitors. Lets examine a few points: 1) Assuming the consortium is successful in creating this technology & standard - the best case is that you will see introduction of products sometime late next year. Add another year after that before you see real market impact. Now lets review the list of successful standards developed by committee: ok done! 2) Again, assuming they are successful, based on the last review of Intellon's powerline solution that I saw, their technology is only legal in the North American market. Asia and Europe have very strict guidelines about what you can put on the powerline and Echelons powerline transceivers conform to those standards. 3) Lets address the assumption of being successful. A few years back Novell attempted to create a home LAN based on powerline and finally gave up. They did have a demo that worked in the lab to some extent. However, it is one thing to create a high speed link in the lab, it is quite another to make it work in a completely unregulated, uncontrollable environment such as the home. I never say never. It might be technically possible to create such a transceiver to give you a high speed connection over existing powerlines, but I am highly skeptical and would want to see the proof before jumping in head first. 4) That brings up the issue of cost. Powerline is difficult at best. To create a high speed reliable connection is likely to be relatively expensive, at least in the early years until critical mass can be developed. Further more, I have discussed this before but to summarize again, IP carries with it a significant overhead that causes a design to use more memory and processing speed than does a LonWorks device. Therefore, the IP based products will be more expensive than LonWorks. 5) Technical Issues: A majority of homes in North America have switches wired in what is called "switched leg". That means the Hot is run to one side of the switch and the other side is run back to the light. The switch makes or breaks the Hot line to the light. These switches do not have Neutral or Ground run to them. With only the Hot line available, Intellon's powerline cannot communicate to those devices. Echelon on the otherhand has solved that problem and has patents in that area. Live ELONg and Prosper Posted as a reply to: Msg 33240 by buttemt View Replies to this Message Go to Msg #: < Previous \| Next > [ First \| Last \| Msg List ] Reply All Subject Message Text Authors Copyright ¸ 1994-2000 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help