To: Dave Swanson who wrote (12160 ) 4/10/2000 6:29:00 PM From: PartyTime Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18366
Hi folks! Sorry, I've been away from EDIG on an ADLT vacation. Sensing EDIG was gonna hit a stall pending its Nasdaq listing, I lined all my ducks in a GE-cloaked fiberoptic telecommuniations play, ADLT. I've been doing really well with it. My early ADLT target price is 25, where I'll shave some profit to buy back into EDIG. It'd be in my best interest to bash EDIG in order to buy back in at a lower price. But I can't and won't do that. Why? 'Cause I believe it's a really good stock, I like it and look forward to strategically reestablishing my position. Meanwhile, I see ranting and raving here has graced this board without my presence. As for ranting and raving, I hereby offer my own: I think all of the major institutions know that most tech stocks are gonna come in with great earnings. It looks like the institutions used a combination of tax season, a misspeak by Clinton and Blair on biotech and probably some bloody bluebloods crying bloody foul that their bloody value/old economy stocks weren't performing. So... The blueblooded institutions exert influence on CNBC to parade a special blend of analysts who continually chirp value/old economy is now hip and in, and that technology/new economy is out of favor, that it's now time to sell tech into a supposed guessing game of what's actually a pre-determined bottom. So the selling happens but not before the blueblooded institutions got to sell at the highs--after all, what started this?--and they then are poised to successfully short the inevitable downtrend in the market. So then... Surprise! Really??? Technology stock earnings come out with glowing reports--what else is new?--and the bloody bluebloods who pushed value/old economy are now appeased, yes, satisfied with a dollup, a dite and a smidgeon of performance. Thus, the blueblooded institutions begin buying technology again profiting from a) having sold at the high; b) shorting the route down; and c) poised to make huge profits riding the mad surf of tech earnings back upward, easily having bought at the pre-determined bottom. Sprinkle in a money-jobbin' market maker spilling spreadlock, a government twist or wrinkle in the Greenspan carpet; and the small folk end up all red portfolio-faced, nursing blue balls having been royally grouted and jammed back and forth where it hurts the most, whilst still trying to wrest free from the mighty headlock of margin call. Nice scene, huh? It's moments like those described above where one can actually take a perverse sense of comfort reading the April 6, 2000 edition of The New York Times relative to the Africa's diamond market and how its intertwined in arms smuggling and hand-chopping--all for the finger of the lovely lady on wedding day. Nice scene, huh? Do we Americans really all get married only to look the other way? Oh, but to be glad we're glad we're here and not there. So what if what we're involved with is a rip-off of a different kind. It doesn't matter much if every now and then you get to win a few points by keeping what money you got in the game. Jon Tara is oft apt to point out: "If you think the game is rigged, why play?" Well, if that's the case, why wear a diamond ring? And the irony is this: Over there they keep the same dictators; over here we elect the same people. What's the problem with this picture. Yes, give me new tech--maybe it'll change the way things really are. Enough already!