Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (94809)	4/11/2000 1:07:00 AM
From: ciVic	Respond to of 108040

what are sheep without a shepherd...eom ciV

To: SouthFloridaGuy who wrote (94809)	4/11/2000 9:27:00 AM
From: SOROS	Respond to of 108040

Warning or setup? I used to think of everything in terms of odds, and with the Nasdaq at 2900 going into November, 1999, this run since then is WAY too suspicious for even the past 3 years historical gains. I keep thinking Clinton/Gore won't let the market crash during an election year (the economy is ALL they have ever had going for them), but I admit ignorance as to the forces that really control what's happening. Perhaps they don't let the WHOLE market crash, but maybe they will let the Nasdaq brutalize everyone who was late to the party by sliding it back to that 2900. This would certainly set up a profitable run for the Houses again, wouldn't it? biz.yahoo.com