Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Z Best Place to Talk Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (22991)	4/11/2000 6:48:00 AM
From: Larry S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

from 7 Bells: <<Nasdaq begins test of last week's low but now is not the time to run for the hills. Pay close attention and buyers will likely emerge into this drop to reward those traders with good timing. Don't be in a hurry and watch for the signs of a double bottom.>> this is part of post at hardrightedge.com larry

To: Ron McKinnon who wrote (22991)	4/11/2000 9:36:00 AM
From: Kelvin Taylor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53068

"but for trading who cares? for trades what matters is volitility up or down, don't matter" I agree with the above statement. whether banks, nets, telcos, etc. what moves is the thing to trade. if "junk" stocks(lower teir inets for example) make a run on mo-mo or some flimsy news release short that sucker and make money on the way down. those stocks that run too far too fast are canidates for downside so I go both short on the high flyers and long on the beaten down quality names that show promise. anything I go long on I don't mind holding for a while. so if they go lower I wait it out.