Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (103713)	4/11/2000 4:06:00 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570616

Elmer Re..<<<If this is true then we should see a big increase in the number of Athlons shipped in Q1, right? I mean a measly 1.2-1.5 million would hardly support your statement if a constrained Intel ships 10x that number of CuMines.>>>>> Well Elmer, I see now that AMD dropped along with the techs you are back badmouthing AMD. If your statements wouldn't be so ridiculous, maybe somebody could belive your lies. You just got done several posts ago telling niceguy that Athlon never was ahead of Cuppermine. Wrong, at lower speeds, 500 to 700 mhz athlon had according to ANAND a up to 15% performance lead mhz to mhz, plus athlon had a sizeable mhz lead for awhile. What really incredulous, here in the above statement you seem to feel a 50 to 90% sales increase quarter to quarter is measly. Most anyalists would consider that a blowout; especially when you consider that 1q-00 blew out 4q-99. But if you want to talk about measly, lets talk about sales of i820; or how about Intels 1 ghz processor sales, now thats measly. How about them Itaniums, are you proud of their sales numbers.? Okay, I will make it easy for you, name me one Intel processor which has been in full production since beginning of 4q-99 which also has had a 50-90% sales increase 4q-99 to 1q-00.