Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (39597)	4/11/2000 12:49:00 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Jd, LOL! Forget about Carl, though. It'd be nice to be able to post a couple of "to the moon" messages every 10 minutes throughout the night. Then you could drown out anyone who did what he's doing. Dave p.s. It went by in a message the other day very quickly but I think someone hit it on the head when they said that Carl is worried because as a memory systems designer, there's no work to do if RDRAM takes over the market. Carl will have to find a new area of expertise and while I know there's a burgeoning tech business in the Great Pacific Northwest, there can't be that many areas he could move into. That's why he's spending so much time posting his views on a board that ultimately does not affect much of anything.

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (39597)	4/11/2000 1:56:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

John, <It is getting apparent that online journalists will find only his posts at market open to explain any opening bell stock price movements.> Nah, those online journalists are still looking to Tom's Hardware Guide to explain RMBS stock movements. Meanwhile, have you seen Tom's latest diatribe on Rambus? tomshardware.com This latest article seems to be spurred by nothing else except Mark Edelstone's comments. Apparently this analyst from Morgan Stanley Dean Witter made a few comments saying that Tom's articles were a little short on facts. So Tom has to resort to a multi-page web article revealing nothing new and just reiterating the same old anti-Rambus FUD that he's been perpetuating for so long. I guess Tom gets a little sensitive when influential people think his articles are full of it. Ego? Tenchusatsu EDIT - Van Smith is actually the author of this latest article, but he and Tom are in the same boat.