Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (77750)	4/11/2000 3:25:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I wouldn't force my views on RELIGION on anyone else- i never said I wouldn't force my views about what the establishment clause means on anyone else. I would vote for people who are going to support keeping public places free FROM religion. It has always been my opinion that the freedom FROM things, is more important than the freedom to DO things- it's a judgment call. I think the passive person deserves more protection than the active person. So, for example, in the case of smoking- the non-smoker isn't doing ANYTHING, except wishing to breathe air with no-smoke- thus the smoker should yield. And with religion, in PUBLIC buildings, where we are FORCED to associate with people we don't want to associate with, those who ACT must yield to those who do nothing. It's just my opinion. i wouldn't car bomb you over it or anything.