SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Edwarda who wrote (77809)4/11/2000 3:38:00 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 108807
 
Answer is: He was a member of the wrong religion and race.



To: Edwarda who wrote (77809)4/11/2000 3:42:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
As I understand it, since I can't speak for him, it was a call to attend to the principles the Anthem professes to stand for. So, yeeah most people saw it as an agenda or protest. Good for him. He sacrificed a lot to stand for a principle. It really doesn't apply to the subject. I just wanted to throw it in.



To: Edwarda who wrote (77809)4/11/2000 3:49:00 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
If it's a private event, and a private reaction it doesn't matter (legally speaking- under the Constitution- I don't want the issue here to become confused)

edit- unless of course, it's a "hate" crime. Musn't forget about those.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News