Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rob108 who wrote (99924)	4/11/2000 4:45:00 PM
From: H James Morris	Respond to of 164684

>I take it you've shorted a few into your acct.. Not enough! Buying to cover today was a big mistake...but I'm not perfect...its something I need to get over. Btw Please pass this on to Billy. > New York, April 11 (Bloomberg) -- Despite what you might read and hear from the loose-lipped media multitude, there's only one U.S. economy. It's the sum of the goods and services Americans produce and buy, whether it's books over the Internet from Amazon.com Inc. or aluminum foil from an Alcoa Inc. factory. There's no such thing as a ``new economy.' Or an ``old economy.' The government doesn't figure a separate inflation rate for the new economy that economists can compare with Brazil's or an unemployment rate for the old economy for comparison with the jobless rate in France. This new economy nonsense is Wall Street's most-brazen attempt yet to seduce investors. Whenever stock prices go to unsustainable heights, brokers and analysts go to great lengths to tell customers, ``It's different this time.' Currently, the pitch is that the Federal Reserve -- with the help of productivity gains generated by computers and the Internet -- has killed inflation. But it's more than just different this time -- it's a whole new economy. That's why you should believe that Commerce One Inc.'s $33.6 million in annual revenue from setting up industrial trading sites on the Internet actually should command a market value of $9.25 billion. Billions for Research And why the shares of Celera Genomics, which seeks to identify every human gene and its function, really are worth $5.62 billion, though last year the company had only $12.5 million in revenue and lost $44.9 million. It goes without saying that you shouldn't question Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. shares trading at 92 times the doughnut- retailer's earnings. God forbid securities firms call the market for what it is. A bubble. A craze. A mania. If they did, everybody would sell; new public offerings would disappear. Trading commissions and investment banking fees would dry up. You know the new economy is a phantom because pundits toss the term around without ever defining it. Ask your broker if drugmaker Merck & Co. is a new-economy stock or an old-economy stock? Watch him scratch his head. And what about Wall Street's own Merrill Lynch & Co.? It looks old -- stockjobbers have been around for centuries -- but it's now acting new, gearing up to buy and sell securities for customers on the Internet. Down the Aisle Home Depot Inc. has to be old economy, doesn't it? Retail stores. Plumbing supplies. Fertilizer. But its stock trades at a new-economy 65 times earnings. For stockbrokers, the neat thing about this made-up dichotomy is that when the new economy hype gets deflated a bit, as it has on occasion in 2000, they simply adopt a new pitch. They switch the saps from Priceline.com Inc. into Ford Motor Co. Ford, of course, makes more sense than Priceline.com -- it probably will benefit more from the Internet through such things as buying parts than Priceline ever will peddling plane tickets and hotel rooms. But investors get put into the stock for the wrong reason. The new-old stuff has subdivisions. When America Online Inc., the biggest Internet service provider, decided to buy Time Warner Inc., which sells movies, magazines and cable-TV service, journalists romanced the deal -- though it killed AOL stock -- as a happy marriage of ``new media' and ``old media.' I wonder, if I start up a newspaper, is it a new newspaper or an old newspaper? This isn't to deny that the economy is changing. The Internet may bring efficiencies we can't imagine. But the economy always is changing. Think of paper money, electricity, oil, the mass production of cars, ice cream. None heralded a ``new economy.' It was still produce, sell, buy, consume. What's really different this time is that the hucksters have taken over. You can be certain that somewhere down the road, there's an ``all-new economy.' Apr/11/2000 9:02