Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Post_Patrol who wrote (64337)	4/11/2000 7:33:00 PM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

The numbers are NOT bad. There is SUPPOSED to be a build now. Aftermarket futures are up, confirming what most "old timers" on this board really know. You also need to read up on what happened in March. Most of the OPEC increase has been arriving for the past few weeks. I expect minimal fallout tomorrow, and probably all of it will occur in the first 30 minutes. Personally I am more intereted in the NG numbers tomorrow afternoon.

To: Post_Patrol who wrote (64337)	4/11/2000 7:44:00 PM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Huh? My dad says they are more or less neutral. You must be playing on people's fear arent you?? Besides, FLC is a long term investment here. Jane:-)

To: Post_Patrol who wrote (64337)	4/11/2000 8:03:00 PM
From: BigBull	Respond to of 95453

If they are so bad how come crude is up and HO is up in the after markets? Why aren't traders falling all over themselves to dump? Apparently only YOU know they are bad. Oh, and don't expect that the DOE numbers will bail you out, because last week they were much milder than the API's. Hey Postman, crude is down like thirty percent in a month, don't be greedy, now. In point of fact Postman, most of this HUUUUUUUUGE amount of crude you are expecting to see next month is already here. Remember Postal, as you so eagerly point out, OPEC is already "cheating" right? The 1.7 mbpd is NOT on top of "cheating", there may only be a few hundred thousand barrels a day over what is CURRENTLY being added. What about all that Norwegian crude that you said was going to flood onto our shores. Ain't gonna happen. Seems to me they are effectively canceling out Mexican supplies. If the Saudi's decide to slow the flow - Kudlow and you are totally COOKED. I notice you don't even BEGIN to deal with the distillate levels problem. You seem to think that that problem will just mysteriously disappear. You don't even begin to deal with what the IEA is saying. That too, is a problem that mysteriously will just fade into oblivion because you wave your collective hands in the air. What happens to your precious theory when low crude prices begin to STIMULATE demand? The whole problem with your theory at this point is that you assume demand will remain constant. Big mistake, with crude prices at these rock bottom prices. Demand will rise. Uh oh.

To: Post_Patrol who wrote (64337)	4/11/2000 8:17:00 PM
From: hdrjr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

Duh I'll play, yeah dude soundz good to me.

To: Post_Patrol who wrote (64337)	4/11/2000 8:31:00 PM
From: Telemarker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95453

The Propaganda Patrol are looking like a herd of lost sheep here. Covering 70% of their short position just before what they view as bearish API numbers. Now they're glad not to be fully invested yet, after screaming about OSX=85 for some time now. I'm sure that all readers of this thread are now eagerly awaiting your next confused call. Face it, you look quite pathetic.