Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : E*Trade (NYSE:ET) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diamond Jim who wrote (13053)	4/12/2000 11:31:00 AM
From: Spytrdr	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 13953

well, if you consider companies with no earnings, NO REVENUES, NO BUSINESS MODEL and NO FUTURE, like ICGE, INSP, etc were valued at $ 55 billion and $ 25 billion respectively at the top, and even decent companies like YHOO or JDSU have HALF ETRADE'S REVENUES, SIMILAR GROWTH RATES, AND YET ARE VALUED AT $ 100 BILLION, well, then the answer to your question could be anywhere from $ 14 billion to something closer to SCHWAB's. ___ "What is a fair value for a co. with no earnings? EGRP will get a higher valuation when it has some earnings"