Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (104201)	4/12/2000 12:01:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1570837

In predictable fashion you call people names rather than address the issue. My post was speculation and I made that clear but apparrently you find the issue too threatening to address so you should have just called me a liar and been done with it. EP, The FUDsters are back!! ted

To: Elmer who wrote (104201)	4/12/2000 12:54:00 PM
From: hmaly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570837

Elmer Re...<<<In predictable fashion you call people names rather than address the issue. My post was speculation and I made that clear but apparrently you find the issue too threatening to address so you should have just called me a liar and been done with it. EP >>>>>>>>>>> Elmer, that is absolutely positively not true as I answered you post yesterday. However it is you who has not answered my reply by not responding to the question "Name me one processor chip that Intel had in production for all of 4q-99 that increased in sales 50 -90% for 1q-00." Why are you setting the standard so high when even the mighty Intel can meet it on any chip? By the way you still haven't posted a link relating to why you believe Crazyman's athlons are demo chips.