SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (77947)4/12/2000 3:09:00 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 108807
 
A wiring that grants a disposition to learning something like morals to further our social evolution- would be the exact way I'd put it- and since you are speaking of an area as fuzzy wuzzy as sociology/philosophy "proof" really doesn't mean much- to me.

And by WHOM is it generally accepted? I don't think we've read the same "whoms".



To: Bill who wrote (77947)4/12/2000 6:33:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
My statement is generally accepted.

If this is the statement you mean:

"history shows that morality evolved out of religious values"

I can't imagine anything less generally accepted. What we call "morality" is simply a set of rules that humans have found it expedient to adopt to make it easier for them to live together. What we call "religion" is something we created to convince people to follow those rules, even when it is more personally expedient not to.