Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (79397)	4/12/2000 4:04:00 PM
From: Tommaso	Respond to of 132070

Right up (down) there with April 3, and taking its place with the other two as the three biggest point declines ever on the Nasdaq.

To: Tommaso who wrote (79397)	4/12/2000 4:09:00 PM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

tommasso, if you took the time to study the research of leading academic scholars you would realize that you cannot time the market hence the only prudent action is to DCA over a long time frame since stocks only rise over the long haul. -vbg- furthermore if the government says we have high productivity it must be true because governments never lie to the masses. mike ho ho ho

To: Tommaso who wrote (79397)	4/12/2000 4:21:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

tom, don't be posted bgr stuff to me 'cause i'm enjoying the bliss of lack-a-nonsense. i know many dolts are panicking right now. those that bought cisco near their top (great company, afterall ;-) and now lost 2/3 of their cash - more if on margin. fair value for the current economy is about naz 2700. if demand sinks due to falling asset prices then 2700 appears HUGE! i just read where some bay area folks are hurtin' b/c they are building custom built homes based on their old option values. DOH! greed personified. when some folks jump out of an airplane w/o a chute <shrug>, they decide to enjoy the view on the way down. oh well... ;-)

To: Tommaso who wrote (79397)	4/12/2000 4:43:00 PM
From: BGR	Respond to of 132070

ROFL!