SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Charles Tutt who wrote (41892)4/12/2000 4:38:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
2. I don't know what you're talking about. What's an IM? Besides, users of Windows should be quite familiar with the procedures for reformatting their hard disks and reinstalling the OS, so no big deal.

He's referring to the blatant anti-competitive blocking of AOL's Instant Messenger from any attempts to allow interoperability with other programs. AOL has changed their program and servers several times over a period of a few weeks late last year to thwart these attempts by Microsoft and others. AOL has a clear monopoly in the Instant Messaging field, owning both number 1 (AIM) and number 2 IM client (who's name escapes me right now) and is clearly engaged in anti-competitive behavior to maintain that monopoly.

A second issue is the AOL 5.0 software. There have been several private class-action lawsuits filed in various states claiming that AOL has intentionally made it almost impossible to connect to a competing ISP even after uninstalling the software. An ISP has also filed a federal (I believe) antitrust suit and is fishing for other ISPs to join it. AOL has an arguably monopoly-sized share of the ISP market and, if the assertions are correct, they are taking clearly anti-competitive measures to maintain it.

Thirdly, if AOL is deemed to have a monopoly position in the ISP market then it's trivial to show that they used that position to extend their monopoly into the Instant Messenger market. Heck, they even ship AIM on the same disk as the AOL software just like Big Bad Microsoft did with Windows and IE. You even have to take special steps if you don't want it installed with the AOL software.

Finally, if reformatting and reinstalling an OS is no big deal, then what do you call merely downloading and installing a program like Netscape?



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (41892)4/12/2000 4:50:00 PM
From: Michael Do  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
>Message #41893 from Charles Tutt at Apr 12 2000 4:06PM

1. Sun doesn't have a monopoly in servers, and doesn't even make SPARC CPU's. Sun systems are competitive with Wintel. Solaris
is cheaper than NT.

2. I don't know what you're talking about. What's an IM? Besides, users of Windows should be quite familiar with the procedures for
reformatting their hard disks and reinstalling the OS, so no big deal.<

Mr. Tutt,
1. What kind of hole have you been living all these days? Sun Solaris costed $2000+ per workstation compare Windows2000 pro $500+. Microsoft does not make CPU either so what is your point?

2. IM is Instant Messaging that AOL blocked Microsoft and Yahoo version from communicated with AOL users. I did not see any government goes after them. For Windows users used to format their hd, you know you are full of it. don't you?

Mike



To: Charles Tutt who wrote (41892)4/12/2000 9:41:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Charles - re: doesn't even make SPARC CPU's
A littlie disingenuous here don't you think? SUNW designs SPARC, owns all of the rights to SPARC, is the only seller of SPARC... the fact that (at the moment) they farm the production of the silicon out to TI has nothing to do with who "makes" SPARC... Even CPQ's ALPHA is more "open", Samsung and API can manufacture their own versions and sell them to anyone...