Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (16898)	4/12/2000 7:56:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

It must be awfully uncomfortable to only feel free to bash the liars and morons and nutjobs of one party, and to feel obligated to blind yourself to the creepiness of the representatives of the other. The fact is, our choice in the next election is between a lying nut and a smirking moron. In government it always comes down to a choice between morons and creeps and it always will. This is why, for the sake of all we hold dear, we have to stop giving morons and creeps more and more control of the nation's wealth. Vote for Gore and you accelerate the process. Vote for Bush and you retard it ( just a little ). That's what it comes down to for me.

To: E who wrote (16898)	4/13/2000 9:25:00 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Well, you win on a few of those points. My problem with your analyses is that you always attack the republican, no matter how bad the democrat is. I usually do the opposite. And au contraire, nuance is me. The flaw of your obsession with Olasky is that he is one of many Bush advisors, from which Bush accepts advice and rejects advice. Like many common folks who employ accounts, lawyers and doctors as advisors, not all advice is accepted. If by posting Olasky's chauvinist quote, you are trying to imply that Bush might accept Olasky's advice on women, I flat out reject that notion. Nothing in Bush's public statements or debates supports Olasky's position.