Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (66786)	4/13/2000 2:02:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Book mark this, remember you heard it here first ( Maybe some of you have already seen this but I haven't ). As soon as relations with Cuba are normalized, the religious left, Big Media, and the other usual socialists will begin demanding that the US pay reparations for the "damage" we've done to the Cuban people with our 40+ year embargo. A nice round trillion sounds about right.

To: jlallen who wrote (66786)	4/13/2000 6:14:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

After I've thought about this, there is no hypocrisy here. There is actually a chilling consistency. The LAW doesn't say Elian goes back to Cuba. The law gives the Executive the power to decide. Clinton has arbitrarily decided ( at least he refuses to explain the reasoning behind his decision ) that the kid goes back. Here's the bottom line. When the rapist says "The important thing to me is the rule of law," he means "The law is what I say it is and we will use all the force at our disposal to enforce our dictates." Where's the inconsistency?