SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ali Chen who wrote (39826)4/13/2000 3:19:00 PM
From: scott  Respond to of 93625
 
Thread: FWIW, here is recent MSDW opinion update on RMBS.

Rambus (RMBS-$212-O) F2Q00 In-Line; Maintain Outperform Mark Edelstone

RMBS operating results were in line with our expectation. RMBS reported F2Q00 (Mar) EPS of $0.15 that met our estimate and were above the consensus estimate of $0.14.
Royalties on shipments of RMBS ICs in the Oct-Dec period increased 33% Q/Q to $3.5MM. In F3Q00, RMBS should start to receive royalties from the launch of Sony Playstation 2 and Direct Rambus-based PCs in F3Q00.
As part of a program for employee retention, RMBS recorded a one-time charge of $171MM associated with the vesting of certain employee options and common stock equivalents. This was a non-cash charge, except for a $1.2MM payment for payroll taxes that should offset by cash received from exercise of the warrants, options and CSEs.
We maintain our Outperform rating. We believe the RMBS story is on track. We continue to believe that RMBS' intellectual property business model offers significant earnings power. We expect RMBS to advance as Direct Rambus gains momentum in the PC market and applications broaden.




To: Ali Chen who wrote (39826)4/13/2000 3:29:00 PM
From: Dave B  Respond to of 93625
 
Ali,

I thought we were discussing merits of Rambus here,

No, I'm talking about making an investment in a company and whether or not that company will succeed. There are technical, marketing, manufacturing, support, and sales factors that have to come together and we're weighing the merits of all of these. In this case, the unbiased benchmarks showing PIII/820/RDRAM systems better than anything else are of great PR value and will be used by many in their buying decision.

Since you happen to be a Dell's investor as well,

I haven't owned Dell since last April. I sold my stake in February before the big tumble, then bought back after I thought they had bottomed out. Lost a little, but not as much as I made before then. However, I would imagine that if Dell starts to see significant field returns, they would consider that a problem and would halt shipment of the RDRAM-based products until the problem was fixed. They're very quality conscious. Since they've been shipping for 3 months now and continue to ship them, I suspect it's not an issue for them.

Dave



To: Ali Chen who wrote (39826)4/13/2000 3:46:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
If you have any evidence to present that RDRAM systems were experiencing high failure rates, you should present it. If you do not then you are simply acting out your biases and trying to harm a company and its prospects out of sheer animus.

This latter type of behavior lacks character!