Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (1737)	4/13/2000 8:59:00 PM
From: KevRupert	Respond to of 1989

Amen Robert. You know "seg" officials are meeting with "vrts" officials and councel deciding what course of action to take. It's a given big money won't approve the deal. I'm out because I don't trust management. I can't, in good conscience, own a stock that I have no faith in its management. If management won't represent your best interests, who will? Like Kevin Landis (owns 3%) said, a LBO serves managements' interests, and therefore management can't be objective or offer shareholders the best value.

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (1737)	4/14/2000 12:02:00 AM
From: Z Analyzer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1989

<<The deal falling apart isn't enough for me. I want to see a new management and a new board of directors. I don't care if the present group comes crawling back with their tails between their legs. They must go. >> I second the motion. The perpetrators should be fired for cause. Put the greedy Bstrds out on the street without their stock options. We'll see if any other company wants to hire them to commit grand larceny while on the payroll. Its getting to the point where SEG would be a buy if we knew the deal would fail. -Z