Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KevinMark who wrote (96485)	4/13/2000 9:08:00 PM
From: Bald Man from Mars	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

Kevin, which chart service do you use ???

To: KevinMark who wrote (96485)	4/13/2000 11:19:00 PM
From: tennessee_ted	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

Kevin- if you were serious... the SI stock screener turned up these guys; the screener doesn't quite work foolproofedly though: ARBA 10.4, ATVI 10.5, BVEW 2.7, DSTM 10.2, ESFT 12.5, HTCH 12.0, NETP 16.9, ONEM 1.16, PPRO 4.9, QSFT 3.6, RNWK 7.1, SBAS 13.3, SCNT 16.4, SPLN 7.6, THDO 12.9, VERT 17.5, WEBB 11.9. <Edit> add LNUX 13.7! Ironically, CRFH didn't turn up on the scan, so there probably are more. I find it real scarey, a lot of familiar names up there. It's like a plague. It will be very instructive to see if your supposition about extremely low RSI stocks proves out. My personal bet is on PSIT to come through this well since its trading at half of what it should be even by what will apparently be the "new" criteria, and has just had the bad luck to have ipo'd when it did (I guess that's my bad luck too, but have made some good $$ in the trading account with it, in spite of unbelievable manipulation by H&Q, the underwriter. Long term shares well underwater). -Ted