SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stu R who wrote (70527)4/13/2000 11:54:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 152472
 
Stu - regarding calculations for predicting Qualcomm's earnings going out ten years :

Did you consider the possible HUGE boost to earnings from a variation (that I just came up with) regarding Maurice Winn's "wacko wireless" pricing scheme ?

(Visit the SI Globalstar thread; read almost any post by Maurice, and he will most likely bring up the topic of "wacko wireless" pricing).

(Pricing based on capacity utilization of the Globalstar constellation at any particular instant, with the ability of you, the person who simply wanted to make a phone call, to "just say no" to that moment's wacko wireless pricing).

Anyway -- my thought on a potential big money maker for Qualcomm and Globalstar -- betting on what the wacko wireless pricing will be (right before you find out the answer) !

Press 1 if you would like to place a wager on what the per minute charge will be ... press 2 if you just want to see the wacko wireless price quote ... press 3 if you want to send Maurice a pizza that he did not order ...

(Apologies in advance to Maurice. These stressful financial markets lately have started "warping" me even more ...)

Good luck to everyone for (possibly) another wild day tomorrow ...

Jon.



To: Stu R who wrote (70527)4/14/2000 12:41:00 AM
From: The Reaper  Respond to of 152472
 
Stu- That was my point exactly when I posted a little while ago. ALReagan did a wonderful job with the math but I think your $86 might be right. God help us all.

kirby



To: Stu R who wrote (70527)4/14/2000 9:41:00 AM
From: A.L. Reagan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 152472
 
Stu - on your math - you've only discounted the terminal value and not the interim cash flows. So, you need to do the NPV of all the cash flows - ten years PV of an annuity, plus the PV of the terminal value.

Hope that helps.