Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (96505)	4/13/2000 11:33:00 PM
From: If only I'd held	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

Don't bother Larry, ask the theiving investment bankers that dumped it on this market. They didn't pay Larry 320 bucks for the stock. Shame on those scummy underwriters, and shame on the idiots that paid the price. Stupid, stupid, stupid. The underwriters only paid 30 for it.....so that must have been all it was worth. Well, it was worth that to them, 'cause they knew they could screw the investor in the open market. Never owned it myself. Just couldn't find any upside to it. I'll pay 1 x sales....or about a buck 30. (1.30) I would pay more, but they need to stop losing all their money first. Look at all those short shares....LOL....gee whiz, I wonder who shorted all that stock. I wouldn't bet on a short squeeze, because Larry will probably be needing to sell some more stock by year's end anyway.