Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (23993)	4/14/2000 4:30:00 PM
From: Paullie	Respond to of 57584

First of all, You obviously have no idea who you are talking to - where I come from, men with the name of paul are called "paullie." As I said before, if you have accurate information to share with this group, then we welcome that. Otherwise, please take your comments somewhere else. Paullie

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (23993)	4/14/2000 4:41:00 PM
From: ~digs	Respond to of 57584

Wanted to reiterate this post of mine: Message 13427692 On October 8th, 1998... when the COMPX was 15% below its 200dma, the institutions stepped in and created a V bottom (there was almost a near perfect candlestick formation as well). Watch for the 2975 level early next week (15% less than the current 200dma). I think we might see some big money step in at that time. Obviously this is not very scientific, but it seems very logical to me. Of course, I'm certainly no expert... and will probably not enter anything myself until we have 2-3 days of positive closes... at which time I will wait for a pullback, and then consider entry. There is no sense in trying to pick the absolute bottom in my mind. We have sold off enough that anything close to the bottom is a good entry point for your favorite tech stock. [If I'm not mistaken this is DelphicOrcl's thinking as well.] Why not wait for the bottom to be clearly established? Much less risky IMO.