SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5013)4/14/2000 11:50:00 PM
From: brk  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
So where is the bottom Uncle A ? 3000? 2800?

gnet will beat earnings est. by at least a dime, but the market don't give a damn.



To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (5013)4/15/2000 8:10:00 AM
From: Hiram Walker  Respond to of 19428
 
Auric, the more I look at the market, the less I think people can tell good,well managed companies from poor companies. That makes the shorting game on individual stocks even harder to understand. I believe you have to cater to the lowest common denominator of society. I believe the average investor is extremely lazy, not above average intelligence, and could not tell you why a company is managed well, and what companies are not managed well.
So when stocks go down, they all go down recursively. I am glad I raised half a million in cash 2 months ago, but I think it did not matter which companies I sold. Over any period of time less than 10 years the stocks that fall do not fall for logic reasons. It would be hard to pick short stocks individually. I was talking to some brokers and suggested shorting an index like the QQQ's a few months ago. I got a call back, and one of them said he could not find any QQQ's to short. I will short an index next time, if I can find one to short, maybe the XLK's. I will never short an individual issue, no matter how poorly it is run. I remember the pain I felt in the 80's from margin calls.
Hiram