Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Terayon - S CDMA player (TERN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (669)	4/15/2000 3:08:00 PM
From: Starlight	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1658

I just did a search on "Pluvia" on all the SI boards. It looks like all of his posts have been REMOVED except for those at these sites: siliconinvestor.com GOOD RIDANCE!!!

To: rrufff who wrote (669)	4/16/2000 2:13:00 AM
From: big run	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1658

rruuuuffff....that's a mouthful what you wrote. My comments about some of the self-styled analyst reports that are either published on the boards or released (after payment of the business wire fee) as a PR is that there is an intent to manipulate after selective disclosure. But how is this different from Merrill disclosing to their select clientelle and then releasing their report to the media??? I think that if someone puts in their time to do the research then that report is their own and they can do with it what they want. These boards provide a medium for the smaller people to share ideas but they're not limited to that. If I were to do extensive research whether or not I care to share that info is my choice, right? Or if I want to share it with a select group that's still my perogative. And whether or not I have a position consistent with my research would also be my perogative, wouldn't it? mike