Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (39964)	4/15/2000 12:54:00 PM
From: multicollinearity	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria: Yes, I believe that Samsung acknowledged very low yields in the early stages of RDRAM production. But your question still does not address my request that you provide some support for your allegation of low yields. Do you have something substantial to base this on, or is it merely speculation/wishful thinking? Multico

To: Scumbria who wrote (39964)	4/15/2000 3:45:00 PM
From: Dave B	Respond to of 93625

Scumbria, Do you believe that if a manufacturer was experiencing poor yields on a critical product, they would make that information public? Then as multicollinearity pointed out, it could be due to a variety of reasons, not just your reason. All he's asking for is the source that led you to your conclusion versus the set of other conclusions. Can you do that (asked only in an objective tone of voice)? Give us steps A, B, C, ... that led to your conclusion and then we can test your assumptions. Thanks, Dave p.s. Reports by The Register will not be considered 100% reliable <G>. Just wanted to give you a heads up.