Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jpmac who wrote (9368)	4/15/2000 1:28:00 PM
From: c.horn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

jpmac; I think this all came to a head last week with this post. Message 13378305 I have no idea why this was posted. It seems to be quite juvenile IMO. Now another member has stated that it is amused by all this attention being paid to her and further states that it is somehow "in on it." I have ignored her and it. But if this keeps up much longer Admin will start getting messages from me to put a halt to this sick behavior. Good Luck C

To: jpmac who wrote (9368)	4/15/2000 1:44:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

My involvement with the lorrie coey saga started here. Message 13380548 You can follow the string from there, but I don't think that this message can be interpreted as threatening or confrontational at all. She then wove me into a fabric of conspiracy through insinuation. I tried to end it. Message 13401272 I even gave her the last word. Message 13401348 You can check her profile to see if she stopped posting on my thread. And yes, these threads are public, but if lorrie coey was truly interested in doing the right thing, she would have backed off and left me alone. My message tying her to "alice" was in the spirit of her weaving me into her conspiracy hoax. Message 13432719 JXM