SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GST who wrote (101089)4/15/2000 9:06:00 PM
From: 10K a day  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
I just want to go to Hawaii!
I owe you lunch! LOL!



To: GST who wrote (101089)4/16/2000 6:06:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
Why Wal-Mart Is Scared of Amazon.com

By Laura Rich

On a symbolic level, the lawsuit filed by Wal-Mart against Amazon.com on Oct.
16 could hardly be more delicious: The nation's largest retailer, itself a
relatively young company that succeeded by breaking all the rules, goes after
an Internet upstart that aspires to be something of a "Wal-Mart of the Web."

But the specifics of the case are more than a little interesting. Wal-Mart
alleges that Amazon. com is essentially trying to steal its Retail Link
computer system by systematically recruiting people from its information
services division.

Retail Link is one of the secrets of Wal-Mart's extraordinary success. It's
lured vendors and suppliers into happily stocking Wal-Mart's shelves, and
allowed it to swiftly knock competitors out of the market. The big draw is in
Retail Link's ability to give vendors Web-based access to information on who's
buying what from which store at what hour, all in real time. And Retail Link
instantly segments that data to suit the vendors' interests.

Wal-Mart is afraid that knowledge of the system ? held by Richard Dalzell and
Jimmy Wright, both former Wal-Mart execs now working at Amazon. com ? could be
used to give the bookseller a much better way to handle inventory than it's
doing now.

Amazon.com has already managed to set up a strong information management
system on the front-end, focusing on customer service and capturing data on
its members. But it's been widely criticized for its inefficient inventory
management. If Amazon.com intends to grow beyond the business of selling books
and music, which most observers believe it does, it has to get its backend
systems in order.

"Amazon realizes that cost is out of control," says Kate Delhagen, director of
the retail group at Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass.

Wal-Mart acknowledges Amazon. com as a competitor ? and Retail Link is one
tool that could help it fend off the upstart.

"If someone's building an engine from scratch for 20 years, it's not fair to
lift that engine and put it in [another frame]," says a Wal-Mart spokesperson.

The other curious fact of the suit is that Wal-Mart named Drugstore.com ? a
new online commerce start-up that has yet to launch ? as a defendant, as well
as uber-VC John Doerr and his firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, which
backed Amazon.com and is now backing Drugstore.com. Are Amazon.com and
Drugstore.com in cahoots? Although both Amazon.com and Drugstore refuse to
comment, sources close to Amazon.com, Drugstore.com and Kleiner indicate a
grand plan, which includes a significant plot of real estate for Drugstore.com
on Amazon.com's front page. This would give a no-name start-up instant access
to people comfortable with online shopping.

Peter Neupert, the former Microsoft exec who runs Drugstore.com, denies
knowledge of Wal-Mart's inventory management systems. He also says there's no
validity to Wal-Mart's claim that Drugstore.com was part of a plot to
intentionally woo away Wal-Mart staff with the intent to duplicate the
inventory management system with vendors.

"I haven't studied the Wal-Mart model at all," he says, "but speaking in the
abstract, the kind of distribution system they're putting together with a
large number of stores is different from ours. I don't really know what they
hope to do except to slow us down."

If Amazon.com has Wal-Mart spooked, or "scared senseless" as Delhagen sees it,
it's probably because the company believes Amazon.com and the Kleiner group of
companies will apply that final piece of the technology puzzle to a broad
array of goods, which it can provide without the high overhead of Wal-Mart's
bricks-and-mortar branch structure.

Michael Parekh, Internet analyst at Goldman Sachs, sees the suit as a parallel
to what happened in the telecommunications industry a few years ago, when ISPs
began to move into the business.

"As the Internet becomes used by more consumers, it affects whole industries ?
retail being one of them. Every incumbent in every industry is going to have
to figure out how to deal with it," says Parekh.

In the meantime, Wal-Mart's e-commerce site features many products sold in
Wal-Mart stores. It also sells a lot of books. And a note on Wal-Mart's home
page points out that, unlike Amazon. com, it ships its books for free.