SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Daytrading Canadian stocks in Realtime -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckey who wrote (35264)4/16/2000 9:35:00 AM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 62347
 
BI was not sure of the time But the Nasq did go to around those numbers what day i'm not sure I guess if I looked at the charts it would tell me but in fact it did drop back from 3800 or 4000 to a low of just over 1800 points and it could do the same here.Another 600 or 700 point drop so why don't they just drop it PDQ and be done with it!
As for Nasq going over 5000 again in 2000 not a chance this Tech market is cooked.The Cat is out of the bag and most of those Super High flyers make no money that goes the same for the Internet.com's and lots of these company's will not be around next year.

PS Don't buy Garbage cause you will be stuck holding the bag.

Cic(Tse)for an example they got 7mil in the bank there burn rate is 3mil per quarter and nobody now to finance them so what happens to Cic.Well they got good stuff so most likely somebody will buy them out Cheap.
These Stocks are not worth the money being paid it was all greed factor.

PS Stay away from buying anything until you know the big boys are buying.

JUst my thoughts



To: Buckey who wrote (35264)4/16/2000 10:38:00 AM
From: E. T.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 62347
 
Long term schlong term, that's what brokers always say. When has anyone had a broker call to say sell, it's always buy for the long term.Broker is interested in the commission.



To: Buckey who wrote (35264)4/16/2000 11:45:00 AM
From: Buckey  Respond to of 62347
 
Obviously I made a typo on my last post - I said 400 - I meant 4000

RED - Here is a yahoo chart on the NAZ for the last two years - I checked the 5 year chart also- NO 3800 or 4000


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News